Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 945/2013 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismissed appeal regarding right to trial by jury for minor crimes by civil servant.

Numero d'incarto KKO 945/2013
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court of Finland dismissed the appeal challenging the requirement for a jury trial in a specific criminal case. The appellant, a civil servant, argued that the prosecution for minor offenses like assault and discrimination violated the right to trial by jury under Section 118 of the Constitution. The court held that the statutory provisions governing jury trials do not extend to these specific minor crimes committed by the appellant, thereby upholding the original decision.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Section 118 of the Constitution; Section 1 of the Act on the Right to Trial by Jury; The right to trial by jury does not apply to minor criminal offenses committed by civil servants.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
right to trial by jury civil servant liability minor criminal offenses Constitutional right prosecution scope infrazione privilegiata reati di comune pericolo motivi di rigore

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Section 118 of the Constitution
Section 1 of the Act on the Right to Trial by Jury
Generato dall'IA
kko-other_2013_946
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding right to trial for public servant accused of discrimination.
ECLI:FI:KKO:2021:56
Spitting with HIV threat constitutes obstruction of duty, not violence, under Finnish Criminal Code Section 16.
appeal_1979_eastern-finland__613
Court dismisses appeal against conviction for intentional official misconduct and drunkenness during official duties. Defendant was fined for failing duties while intoxicated.
kko-precedent_2006_33
Supreme Court dismisses appeal; individual acts are not one crime due to lack of continuous intent.
kko-precedent_1992_126
Supreme Court convicted court officials for negligent duty breach by failing to serve civil claims in criminal trials.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Kysymys perustuslain 118 §:n 3 momentin mukaisesta syyteoikeudesta A:n vaadittua virkamiehelle rangaistusta paitsi törkeästä virka-aseman väärinkäyttämisestä tai tuottamuksellisesta virkavelvollisuuden rikkomisesta myös siitä, että tämä oli julkista tehtävää hoitaessaan syyllistynyt pahoinpitelyyn tai vammantuottamukseen sekä heitteillepanoon ja syrjintään.