Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 2560/2013 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismissed appeal regarding collection of debt based on waste transport services.

Numero d'incarto KKO 2560/2013
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal against the lower court's decision to collect a debt arising from waste transport services. The appellant argued that the general court lacked jurisdiction over this specific commercial dispute, while the respondent maintained the lower court had proper authority. The court ruled that the matter fell within the general court's jurisdiction as it involved a standard civil debt claim.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Laki yleisistä tuomioistuimista 766/1996; Laki lainperusteisista velkojen perimisestä 1050/2004: The Supreme Court confirmed that general courts have jurisdiction over debt collection cases based on waste transport services, rejecting arguments of special jurisdiction.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
general court jurisdiction waste transport services debt collection appeal civil procedure law Supreme Court decision cosa fuori commercio difetto di legittimazione dell'azionista responsabilità del vettore

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Laki yleisistä tuomioistuimista 766/1996
Laki lainperusteisista velkojen perimisestä 1050/2004
Generato dall'IA
kho-precedent_2014_86
Supreme Administrative Court requests ECJ ruling on whether public procurement rules apply to a mixed reimbursement and transport booking scheme.
ECLI:FI:KKO:2019:32
Supreme Court dismisses appeal; risk of dissipation exists despite partial enforcement and business stability arguments.
kho-precedent_2004_102
Supreme Administrative Court dismisses appeal; City violated public procurement law by contracting without tender.
market_2005_5
Market Court annuls procurement decision for failing to apply cost-effectiveness criteria transparently.
kho-other_2017_6083
Supreme Administrative Court reversed Market Court, holding tender rejection for missing maintenance info did not violate equal treatment.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Kysymys yleisen tuomioistuimen toimivallasta jätteenkuljetukseen perustuvan saatavan perimistä koskevassa asiassa.