Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 1089/2013 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court allows security measure to prevent owner blocking road easement use despite prior appeal rejection.

Numero d'incarto KKO 1089/2013
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court allowed a security measure to prevent the owner of the burdened property from blocking the use of a road easement. The owner had previously appealed the establishment of the easement, which the Land Court rejected, and subsequently sought to stop the easement holders from using the road. The court ruled that the potential harm to the easement holders justified the temporary restriction on the owner's rights to prevent obstruction.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Section 10 of the Land Code; Section 10 of the Land Code: The court may grant a security measure to prevent the owner of the burdened property from obstructing the use of a road easement when the easement has been established and the owner's prior appeal has been rejected.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
road easement security measure Land Code property owner obstruction prevention burdened property easement holders restrizione di diritto pubblico della proprietà

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Section 10 of the Land Code
Generato dall'IA
kko-other_2004_2148
Supreme Court dismissed permanent easement claim based on 1977 Ojalaki due to lack of statutory basis for permanent rights.
kko-other_2003_625
Supreme Court dismissed appeal; land court erred by binding a third party without notice.
kko-precedent_2003_122
Supreme Court allows easement creation under zoning plan without owner consent per statutory provisions.
ECLI:FI:KKO:2017:90
Supreme Court dismisses exclusive use easement order as disproportionate harm to burdened estate under Land Division Act.
kho-other_2026_1699
Supreme Administrative Court allows appeal, ruling that a property owner can block access to private roads without specific statutory conditions.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Kiinteistötoimituksessa oli perustettu kiinteistön hyväksi rasiteoikeus kulkuyhteyttä varten toisen kiinteistön alueella. Rasitetun kiinteistön omistajayhtiön valitettua rasiteoikeusratkaisusta maaoikeus oli hylännyt valituksen. Yhtiö, joka oli myös tuossa vaiheessa estänyt rasitetien käyttämisen, oli hakenut muutosta maaoikeuden ratkaisuun Korkeimmassa oikeudessa. Kysymys siitä, oliko tierasitteeseen oikeutettujen näissä olosuhteissa tekemästä hakemuksesta voitu myöntää turvaamistoimi, jolla rasitetun kiinteistön omistajaa kiellettiin estämästä rasitetien käyttäminen.