Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 2077/2012 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court remands murder charge to lower court after considering new prosecution evidence previously excluded.

Numero d'incarto KKO 2077/2012
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Parzialmente accolto (Partially Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court of Finland remanded the case to the district court after the prosecution submitted new evidence regarding the murder charge that had previously been excluded due to lack of proof. The lower court had dismissed the charge as unsubstantiated, but the Supreme Court found the new information material to the proceedings. Consequently, the case was sent back for a fresh examination to determine if the new evidence warrants a conviction.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

s. 24 of the Code of Judicial Procedure; where new evidence is submitted by the prosecution after a lower court's dismissal of a charge, the Supreme Court may remand the case for re-examination if the new evidence is relevant to the facts.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
murder charge dismissal new prosecution evidence remand for re-examination Code of Judicial Procedure exclusion of evidence Supreme Court review procedural remand diritto a una copertura assicurativa più estesa

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
s. 24 of the Code of Judicial Procedure
Generato dall'IA
kko-other_2018_944
Supreme Court allows retrial when lower court wrongly denies it based on insufficient evidence of participation in crime.
kko-precedent_1996_133
Supreme Court dismisses appeal; remand for hearing absent owner was improper when only defendant sought review.
kko-other_2020_939
Supreme Court allows appeal for retrial when lower court wrongly denies it in criminal case.
kko-precedent_2003_108
Supreme Court held defendant liable for costs despite acquittal due to post-trial lighter law application.
kko-other_2009_2319
Supreme Court allows appeal when lower court wrongly issues default judgment during preparation phase.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Hovioikeus oli hylännyt näyttämättömänä murhaa koskevan syytteen. Syyttäjien vasta Korkeimmassa oikeudessa esittämä uusi selvitys otettiin huomioon ja asia palautettiin käräjäoikeuteen käsiteltäväksi.