Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 1616/2012 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismisses appeal when legal interest in challenging lower court decision ceases to exist.

Numero d'incarto KKO 1616/2012
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court of Finland dismissed the appeal because the appellants no longer possessed a legal interest in challenging the Court of Appeal's decision. The lower court had rejected the request to release the court-appointed lawyers from their duties, and the appellants subsequently sought leave to appeal. The court ruled that without a continuing legal interest, the proceedings for the appeal must terminate.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Oikeudenkäyntiasiamiehet 1990-luvun luvuilla; when a party loses the legal interest to challenge a final decision, the appeal proceedings must cease.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
legal interest cessation of proceedings court-appointed lawyer final decision supreme court appeal restituzione in pristino soddisfacimento del credito impedimenti all'allontanamento
Generato dall'IA
kko-precedent_2000_115
Supreme Court dismisses prosecutor's appeal as coercive detention law prohibits appeals by the requesting party.
kko-other_2018_448
Supreme Court allows state to reimburse defendant's court costs when prosecution and victim withdraw charges.
appeal_1981_eastern-finland__65
Court upheld guardianship decision against appeal, citing lack of need for public notice.
appeal_1979_turku__1145
Court dismissed appeal on free legal aid, transferring case to proper jurisdiction due to procedural error.
appeal_1981_kouvola__322
Appeal dismissed; orderman lacked valid ID, so conviction for violent resistance was upheld.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Oikeudenkäyntiasiamiehet olivat pyytäneet, että hovioikeus vapauttaa heidät oikeudenkäyntiasiamiehen tehtävistä. Hovioikeus hylkäsi pyynnön. Päätökseen sai hakea erikseen muutosta valituslupaa pyytämällä. Koska valittajilla ei enää ollut oikeudellista tarvetta hakea muutosta, lausunnon antaminen valituksesta raukesi.