Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding lower court's duty to supplement respondent's serious driving under influence charge.
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe Supreme Court dismissed the respondent's appeal against the lower court's decision to supplement the charge of serious driving under influence. The respondent argued that the lower court failed in its duty to fully investigate and supplement the facts regarding the alleged intoxication. The court held that the lower court acted within its discretion and was not obligated to independently supplement the charge beyond the evidence presented.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IALaki rikosasioista 37. luku; 10. luku: Rikosoikeudellisen toimenpiteen aloittaminen; Rikosoikeudellisen toimenpiteen aloittamisvelvollisuus: Hovioikeudella ei ole velvollisuutta täydentää vastaajan valitusta törkeää rattijuopumusta, jos asianajaja on esittänyt riittävät todisteet.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IATesto completo
Kysymys hovioikeuden velvollisuudesta täydennyttää vastaajan valitusta törkeää rattijuopumusta ynnä muuta koskevassa asiassa.