Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 432/2010 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court allows appeal against bankruptcy secured claim dismissal due to missing creditor statement.

Numero d'incarto KKO 432/2010
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Parzialmente accolto (Partially Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Court of First Instance dismissed the appeal against a secured claim in bankruptcy proceedings because the creditor failed to submit a written statement. The Court of Appeal found this procedural error prevented a proper trial and ordered the case to be retried. Consequently, the Supreme Court upheld the retrial order, mandating the lower court to schedule a hearing for the creditor to provide the required statement.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Section 10 of the Bankruptcy Act 1998; Section 2 of the Bankruptcy Act 1998: When a secured claim in bankruptcy proceedings is dismissed due to the creditor's failure to submit a written statement, the court must correct the procedural error and allow the creditor an opportunity to provide the statement.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
bankruptcy secured claim procedural error correction creditor written statement appeal against dismissal retrial order vizio di procedura giudizio sul merito della causa principio della lex mitior

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Section 10 of the Bankruptcy Act 1998
Section 2 of the Bankruptcy Act 1998
Generato dall'IA
kko-other_2009_2319
Supreme Court allows appeal when lower court wrongly issues default judgment during preparation phase.
kko-precedent_1994_26
Supreme Court dismisses appeal where lower court relied on unheard expert opinion regarding collective agreement applicability.
kko-precedent_2013_14
Supreme Court dismisses appeal when High Court wrongly denies retrial while altering lower court's reasoning.
kko-other_1997_1608
Supreme Court dismisses appeal where lower court rejected incomplete complaint without notice due to respondent's possession of full document.
kko-precedent_1997_90
Supreme Court dismisses appeal when lower court bases verdict on facts not argued by parties without hearing them.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Käsitellessään konkurssissa valvotun saatavan riitautusta käräjäoikeus oli jättänyt asian sillensä, koska saatavansa valvonut velkoja ei ollut antanut pyydettyä kirjallista lausumaa. Velkojan hakemuksesta hovioikeus katsoi, ettei käräjäoikeuden olisi tullut jättää asiaa sillensä, vaan ratkaista se tuomiolla. Oikeudenkäyntivirheen johdosta hovioikeus poisti käräjäoikeuden päätöksen, palautti asian käräjäoikeuteen uudelleen käsiteltäväksi ja määräsi käräjäoikeuden varaamaan velkojalle tilaisuuden antaa lausuma riitautuksen johdosta.

Kysymys hovioikeuden menettelyn oikeellisuudesta.