Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding conditional sentence supervision breach where no specific harm occurred.

The Supreme Court dismissed the applicant's appeal against a decision to revoke a conditional sentence due to a breach of supervision conditions. The applicant argued that failing to report travel plans constituted a serious violation warranting immediate revocation, while the lower court found no concrete harm or danger to society. The court upheld the lower decision because the breach, though procedural, did not meet the threshold for revocation under Finnish law absent tangible consequences.