Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 310/2009 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court allows appeal on evidence submission regarding pilot's intoxication during flight.

Numero d'incarto KKO 310/2009
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, overturning the lower court's decision on the necessity of re-examining witness testimony. The lower court had found the pilot intoxicated based on witness observations but questioned the proper procedure for submitting evidence. The court ruled that the appellate court must conduct a full hearing to verify the factual basis of the intoxication claim.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Laki 1093/1999 oikeusprosessilain 101 ja 102 luvuista: The appellate court is obligated to conduct a full trial and re-examine the evidence when the lower court's findings on material facts are contested.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
appellate procedure evidence submission intoxication flight safety witness testimony prova piena mezzi di prova medici difetto di prova del nesso causale

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Laki 1093/1999 oikeusprosessilain 101 luku
Laki 1093/1999 oikeusprosessilain 102 luku
Generato dall'IA
kko-precedent_2002_15
Supreme Court dismisses appeal when appellate court increases sentence and oral hearing is clearly unnecessary.
kko-other_2009_718
Supreme Court held lower court must provide main hearing in compensation case to ensure fair trial rights.
kko-other_2010_2388
Supreme Court held lower court must transfer serious theft cases to main hearing without delay.
kko-other_2010_1291
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding High Court's duty to hold main trial for bookkeeping crime.
kko-precedent_2004_70
Supreme Court dismisses appeal; parties cannot call witness in court of appeal if they could not in lower court.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Lentoemännän työsopimuksen purkamista koskevassa asiassa hovioikeus oli käräjäoikeuden tuomiossa selostettujen todistajien havaintojen perusteella katsonut toisin kuin käräjäoikeus, että lentoemäntä oli ollut lennolla alkoholin vaikutuksen alaisena. Kysymys hovioikeuden velvollisuudesta toimittaa pääkäsittely ja vastaanottaa uudelleen kysymystä koskeva todistelu.