Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 2319/2009 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court allows appeal when lower court wrongly issues default judgment during preparation phase.

Numero d'incarto KKO 2319/2009
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court of Finland allowed the appeal against a district court's default judgment rendered during the preparation phase. The district court had issued a default judgment because the respondent failed to appear, relying on a summons that permitted such a ruling. The Court of Appeal had previously quashed this decision, holding that the case could not be resolved by default judgment at that procedural stage.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Käräjäoikeus 10 §; Hovioikeus 10 §: A default judgment issued during the preparation phase is invalid if the case requires a full trial to resolve the substantive issues.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
default judgment preparation phase procedural error appeal admissibility summary judgment vizio di procedura giudizio sul merito della causa ritardo ingiustificato

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Käräjäoikeus 10 §
Hovioikeus 10 §
Generato dall'IA
kko-precedent_2013_14
Supreme Court dismisses appeal when High Court wrongly denies retrial while altering lower court's reasoning.
kko-precedent_2003_108
Supreme Court held defendant liable for costs despite acquittal due to post-trial lighter law application.
kko-other_2006_2856
Supreme Court allows appeal against dismissal of fraud charges due to procedural defect in lower court composition.
kko-other_2013_226
Supreme Court held that lower courts must transfer cases to the main court for criminal proceedings.
kko-other_2018_944
Supreme Court allows retrial when lower court wrongly denies it based on insufficient evidence of participation in crime.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Käräjäoikeus oli kutsunut asianosaiset samalla kutsulla samana päivänä pidettäviin valmisteluistuntoon ja pääkäsittelyyn. Kutsun mukaan asia voitiin asianosaisen poissa ollessa vastapuolen vaatimuksesta ratkaista tuomiolla tai yksipuolisella tuomiolla tai jättää sillensä. Vastaaja ei saapunut istuntoon. Kantajan pyydettyä pääkäsittelyn toimittamista ja asian ratkaisemista tuomiolla käräjäoikeus käsitteli asian pääkäsittelyssä ja ratkaisi asian tuomiolla. Hovioikeus kumosi käräjäoikeuden tuomion ja palautti asian käräjäoikeuteen uudelleen käsiteltäväksi katsoen, että asia ei ollut ollut ratkaistavissa valmisteluvaiheessa annettavalla tuomiolla. Kysymys hovioikeuden menettelyn oikeellisuudesta.