Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 2133/2009 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court held that pre-sentence danger assessment based on prior mental state report is valid without new examination.

Numero d'incarto KKO 2133/2009
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court allowed the release of a convicted person without a new mental state examination. The prosecution argued for a fresh assessment of danger before release, while the defense relied on an existing report. The court ruled that the prior report sufficed to evaluate danger, making a new examination unnecessary.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

RL 2 c luku 11 §; OK 17 luku 45 § 3 mom: A court may base a decision on a convict's release on a prior mental state report and its contained danger assessment without ordering a new examination.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
pre-sentence danger assessment mental state examination prior report sufficiency convict release procedure risk evaluation standard perizie mediche superate perizia medica aggiornata proroga della misura terapeutica

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
RL 2 c luku 11 §
OK 17 luku 45 § 3 mom
Generato dall'IA
ECLI:FI:KKO:2019:89
Supreme Court dismisses life prisoner's parole request, ruling release date must be delayed until late 2019 due to crime severity.
kko-precedent_2000_119
Supreme Court allows detention of non-psychiatrically examined defendant after 14-day trial adjournment.
kko-precedent_2007_90
Supreme Court allows full deduction of time lost to freedom from a new prison sentence based on established practice.
kko-precedent_2015_102
Supreme Court rules probation period must be deducted from probation sentence, not community service, to avoid harsher total punishment.
appeal_1986_rovaniemi__1677
Court held that 7 months and 5 days of imprisonment counts as full execution of an 8-month sentence.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Kysymys siitä, olisiko tuomioistuimen pitänyt määrätä syytetyn mielentila tutkittavaksi ja pyytää lausunto hänen vaarallisuudestaan ennen kuin se teki päätöksen siitä, että tuomittu vapautuu vankilasta vasta hänen suoritettuaan tuomitun rangaistusajan kokonaan, vai voitiinko arvio syytetyn vaarallisuudesta tehdä hänestä aikaisemmin tehdyn mielentilalausunnon ja siihen sisältyvän vaarallisuusarvion perusteella.

RL 2 c luku 11 §

OK 17 luku 45 § 3 mom