Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 1383/2009 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court allows sale of separate apartment shares as one unit for partition purposes under company bylaws.

Numero d'incarto KKO 1383/2009
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court permitted the sale of two separate apartment shares as a single unit to facilitate a partition agreement between the owners. The owners held distinct shares in a condominium building where the rooms were physically combined into one dwelling, and the company bylaws did not explicitly prohibit such a sale. The court ruled that the bylaws allowed the sale of shares as a whole for the purpose of implementing a partition, overriding the physical separation of the shares.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Company bylaws; partition agreement: The court held that company bylaws permitting the sale of shares as a whole allow owners to sell separate shares constituting a combined unit for the purpose of implementing a partition agreement.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
condominium shares partition agreement company bylaws sale of shares separate ownership combined unit property division contiguità

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Company Act 609/1997
Generato dall'IA
kko-precedent_1993_109
Supreme Court allows sale of estate land when partition is legally impossible due to zoning and lack of co-owner consent.
kko-other_2020_1567
Supreme Court dismissed appeal regarding apartment company resolution invalidity affecting continued residence permit conditions.
ECLI:FI:KKO:2019:38
Supreme Court declares assembly room takeover invalid due to minor breach of bylaws and equal treatment issues.
ECLI:FI:KKO:2025:26
Supreme Court dismisses challenge to apartment co-op share increase as valid share issuance under Act. Court rules share count increase constitutes issuance. Court rejects procedural defect argument regarding share issuance. Court finds share issuance valid under Act provisions. Court dismisses objection based on lack of specific details. Court upholds share issuance despite missing information. Court concludes share issuance was legally effective. Court rejects challenge to share issuance validity. Court affirms share issuance under Act requirements.
appeal_1979_eastern-finland__74
Court allows sale of specific co-owned parts but dismisses request to sell entire property together.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Pääosa A:n ja B:n välillä toimitettavan osituksen piiriin kuuluvasta omaisuudesta muodostui asunto-osakeyhtiön osakkeista. Yhtiöjärjestyksen mukaan yhtiön hallitsema omakotitalo käsitti kaksi eri huoneistoa, joista A omisti toisen ja B toisen hallintaan oikeuttavat osakkeet. Huoneistot oli kuitenkin yhdistetty yhdeksi asunnoksi. Kysymys siitä, voitiinko pesänjakajalle myöntää lupa myydä yhtiön osakkeet yhtenä kokonaisuutena osituksen toteuttamiseksi.