Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 882/2008 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding attempted burglary charges when facts do not meet threshold for serious theft.

Numero d'incarto KKO 882/2008
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's appeal concerning charges of attempted serious theft for entering occupied dwellings. The prosecution alleged the defendant entered homes with intent to steal, while the defense argued the circumstances did not constitute the aggravated offense. The court determined that the specific facts presented failed to satisfy the legal requirements for the charge of serious theft.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Laki rikosrekisteristä 1069/1999; 1069/1999 rikoslaki: The court held that entry into occupied dwellings without specific aggravating circumstances does not automatically constitute the crime of serious theft.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
attempted serious theft occupied dwellings burglary charges criminal threshold Supreme Court appeal cosa locata pretesa abusiva del locatore cosa affidata

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
1069/1999 rikoslaki
Generato dall'IA
appeal_1983_helsinki__1202
Court convicted defendant of serious theft using a hook to bypass a lock.
kko-leave_2026_25
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding severe damage to a Bronze Age settlement caused by timber harvesting.
kko-precedent_2013_57
Attempted burglary of occupied homes insufficiently proven for aggravated theft due to lack of holistic evidence.
kko-precedent_2015_52
Supreme Court of Finland allows appeal, finding fraud serious due to high benefit amount despite mitigating circumstances.
appeal_1981_eastern-finland__889
Court dismisses theft charge for unauthorized use of a locked car taken via burglary.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

A oli anastustarkoituksessa tunkeutunut asuttuihin asuntoihin. Kysymys siitä, oliko A syyllistynyt törkeän varkauden yrityksiin.