Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 688/2008 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismisses lawyer's fee claim when defense mandate is legally suspended during appeal proceedings.

Numero d'incarto KKO 688/2008
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the lawyer's claim for court fees because their mandate was legally suspended during the appeal proceedings. The lower court had determined that the defense mandate ceased to exist under the Criminal Procedure Act, rendering the fee claim invalid. Consequently, the court held that no fees were due as the professional service was not rendered under an active mandate.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Section 4(3) of Chapter 2 of the Act on Criminal Proceedings; A lawyer's claim for court fees is inadmissible if the defense mandate has been legally suspended or terminated during the appeal proceedings.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
criminal procedure defense mandate fee suspension appeal proceedings lawyer remuneration ammissione del pubblico ministero vizio di procedura atto d'imperio

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Section 4(3) of Chapter 2 of the Act on Criminal Proceedings
Generato dall'IA
kko-precedent_2013_45
Supreme Court allows immediate appeal for defense lawyer's fees when lower court ruling is questionable.
kko-other_2013_2022
Supreme Court dismissed appeal regarding state defense lawyer fee liability when client had right to free legal aid.
kko-precedent_2015_14
Supreme Court dismisses appeal dismissal due to clear constitutional conflict with fair trial rights.
appeal_1982_eastern-finland__1082
Court dismissed lawyer's claim for costs when client failed to prove authorization despite offered chance to submit power of attorney.
kko-other_2004_2291
Supreme Court held lower court must transfer main criminal case to ensure complete proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Puolustajaksi käräjäoikeudessa määrätylle ei ollut maksettu hovioikeudessa palkkiota, koska puolustajan määräys oli hovioikeuden mukaan oikeudenkäynnistä rikosasioissa annetun lain 2 luvun 4 §:n 3 momentin nojalla rauennut. Kysymys puolustajan oikeudesta palkkioon.