Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 30/2008 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismisses appeal where lower courts failed to notify parties of correction hearings.

Numero d'incarto KKO 30/2008
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal against a decision by the District Court and Court of Appeal. Both lower courts had amended judgments without notifying the parties of the correction hearings or attaching appeal instructions to the amendments. The court ruled that the failure to provide parties with an opportunity to be heard on the amendments violated procedural rights under the Code of Judicial Procedure.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

KOK 24 luku 10 §:n nojalla oikaistua tuomiota koskevan asianosaisille kuulemisen oikeuden puuttumisen vuoksi annettua päätöstä ei voida muuttaa; korjausmenettelyssä on varattava asianosaisille tilaisuus tulla kuulluksi.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
Code of Judicial Procedure right to be heard judgment correction procedural fairness notification requirement Supreme Court of Finland amended judgment omissione del difensore

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
KOK 24 luku 10 §
Generato dall'IA
kko-other_2009_2319
Supreme Court allows appeal when lower court wrongly issues default judgment during preparation phase.
kko-precedent_2014_25
Supreme Court quashes lower court verdict due to denial of defense preparation time and lack of legal aid.
kko-precedent_2003_108
Supreme Court held defendant liable for costs despite acquittal due to post-trial lighter law application.
appeal_1973_vaasa__281
Court of Appeal corrected a calculation error in a reduction order under the 1973 Act on Reduction of Sentence.
kko-other_2023_1167
Supreme Court allows partial costs award where lower court failed to address initial trial expenses.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Käräjäoikeus oli oikeudenkäymiskaaren 24 luvun 10 §:n nojalla oikaissut tuomiotaan lisäämällä siihen siitä puuttuneen tuomiolauselman varaamatta asianosaisille tilaisuutta tulla kuulluksi oikaisun johdosta ja liittämättä oikaisuun muutoksenhakuohjausta. Hovioikeus, joka ei myöskään ollut varannut asianosaisille tilaisuutta tulla kuulluksi tuomion oikaisun johdosta, ei muuttanut käräjäoikeuden oikaistua tuomiota.

Kysymys käräjäoikeuden ja hovioikeuden menettelyn oikeellisuudesta.

OK 24 luku 10 §