Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 2302/2008 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismisses interim injunction claim where defendant's comparative advertising is not proven false or misleading.

Numero d'incarto KKO 2302/2008
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's request for an interim injunction against the defendant's comparative advertising practices. The plaintiff alleged that the defendant used false and misleading statements regarding mobile phone networks but failed to substantiate these claims with evidence. Consequently, the court ruled that the statutory requirements for granting an interim measure were not met due to the lack of proof regarding the falsity of the advertising.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

SopMenL 7 § 1 mom; An interim injunction may only be granted if the applicant demonstrates that the opponent's conduct is likely to cause irreparable harm and that the conduct is unlawful or would otherwise be prohibited by law.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
interim injunction comparative advertising false statements misleading claims procedural requirements Supreme Court SopMenL elementi di verosimiglianza

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
SopMenL 7 § 1 mom

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
KKO:2008:96
Supreme Court allows temporary injunction against false mobile network marketing claims with 150k euro penalty.
Generato dall'IA
kko-precedent_2008_96
Supreme Court allows temporary injunction against false mobile network marketing claims with 150k euro penalty.
kho-other_2016_61
Supreme Administrative Court allows appeal against Sami Council's decision to retry 2015 elections due to procedural violations.
market_1986_13
Market Court bans company from running discriminatory lotteries and misleadingly citing consumer protection ban.
kko-other_2016_2355
Supreme Court dismisses claim for damages from illegal competition restrictions due to statute of limitations expiration.
kho-precedent_2016_176
Supreme Administrative Court dismissed appeal; ad breaks and sponsor logos count toward ad time limits under Finnish Broadcasting Act.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

A oli katsonut S:n käyttävän matkapuhelinverkkoja koskevassa vertailevassa mainonnassa totuudenvastaisia ja harhaanjohtavia ilmaisuja ja vaatinut, että S:ää kielletään väliaikaisesti jatkamasta menettelyään. Kysymys väliaikaisen kiellon määräämisen edellytyksistä ja niistä seikoista, jotka oli otettava huomioon väliaikaista kieltoa koskevaa hakemusta ratkaistaessa. Ks. KKO:2008:96

SopMenL 7 § 1 mom