Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 1740/2008 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court allows claim for costs of terminated cooperation agreement where contract was validly formed despite potential loss.

Numero d'incarto KKO 1740/2008
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court of Finland allowed the plaintiff's claim for costs incurred due to the termination of a cooperation agreement. The lower courts had previously dismissed the claim, first because the contract's formation was not proven, and later because the contract might have been unprofitable. The Supreme Court ruled that the contract was validly formed and that the plaintiff was entitled to cost recovery even if the agreement resulted in a financial loss, as the risk was not the plaintiff's fault.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

s. 24 of the Code of Judicial Administration; where a contract is validly formed, the party entitled to costs for its termination may recover expenses even if the contract was ultimately unprofitable, provided the loss was not due to the claimant's own fault.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
cooperation agreement termination costs recovery claim contract formation validity financial loss risk judicial administration code supreme court review procedural conduct contumacia di una parte

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
s. 24 of the Code of Judicial Administration
Generato dall'IA
appeal_1984_helsinki__639
Court of Appeal quashes Regional Court decision for failure to specify statutory important reason for termination.
kko-other_2018_2306
Supreme Court allows appeal against lower court's award of price reduction and damages for construction defects.
appeal_1986_eastern-finland__2217
Court dismissed appeal regarding property division agreement validity in divorce proceedings.
kko-other_2007_964
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding lower court's duty to examine secondary asylum claim.
ECLI:FI:KKO:2018:68
Supreme Court allows settlement on legal costs despite legal aid, as it wasn't solely to avoid state liability.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Käräjäoikeus, jossa kantaja vaati korvausta vastaajan menettelyn vuoksi purkautuneen yhteistyösopimuksen aiheuttamista kuluista, hylkäsi kanteen sillä perusteella, ettei sopimusta ollut näytetty syntyneen. Hovioikeus, jossa vastaaja edelleen vastusti kannetta sillä perusteella, ettei sopimusta ollut syntynyt, puolestaan katsoi, että sopimus oli syntynyt, mutta hylkäsi korvausvaatimuksen, koska sopimus olisi saattanut olla tappiollinen, eikä kantajalla tämä tietoisesti ottamansa riski huomioon ottaen ollut oikeutta saada korvausta sopimuksen aiheuttamista kuluista. Kysymys siitä, oliko hovioikeus voinut vastaajan kanteen kiistämiselle esittämä peruste huomioon ottaen hylätä kanteen sanotulla perusteella. Kysymys myös aineellisesta prosessinjohdosta hovioikeudessa ja hovioikeuden velvollisuudesta toimittaa asiassa pääkäsittely.