Supreme Court held that ownership of a water area transferred with a land grant includes the water area itself.

The Supreme Court ruled that when a land grant was transferred, the ownership rights of the adjacent water area were also transferred. The applicant argued that the water area remained separate from the land grant, while the opposing party contended that the transfer included all associated rights. The court decided in favor of the transfer of water area ownership because the grant was intended to cover the entire property, including the water body.