Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 1225/2008 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court held that a drunk driving conviction does not automatically prove lack of criminal capacity.

Numero d'incarto KKO 1225/2008
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal regarding the defendant's criminal capacity at the time of the offense. The defendant argued that a conviction for severe drunken driving proved he lacked the mental capacity to commit the crime. The court rejected this, ruling that intoxication alone does not establish a lack of criminal responsibility under Finnish law.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Section 10 of the Criminal Code; Section 10 of the Criminal Code establishes that a person is criminally responsible for an intentional or negligent act unless they lacked the capacity to understand the nature of the act or control their actions due to mental illness or developmental disorder, and intoxication is not a sufficient ground for such exemption.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
criminal capacity intoxication defense mental illness criminal responsibility Finnish Criminal Code drunk driving supreme court stato di salute psichica

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Section 10 of the Criminal Code
Generato dall'IA
kko-other_1997_1381
Supreme Court held that a defendant's lack of understanding of crimes does not automatically preclude criminal liability.
kko-other_2006_13
Supreme Court held that a defendant with prior convictions lacked criminal responsibility due to mental illness.
kko-other_2004_2630
Supreme Court held that a defendant's lack of understanding during the crime negates criminal liability under Finnish law.
kko-other_2011_469
Supreme Court held a convicted official was not criminally liable due to lack of capacity at the time of the crime.
kko-other_1999_1869
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding conditional sentence for serious fraud and debtor insolvency.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Kysymys siitä, oliko törkeästä rattijuopumuksesta ynnä muusta rangaistukseen tuomittu ollut rikostensa tekoaikana syyntakeeton.