KKO 1911/2007
Generato dall'IA
Supreme Court dismissed appeal regarding insurance law procedure where insurer failed to comment on new claim.
Finlandia (FI)
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe Supreme Court dismissed the appeal against a lower court decision regarding an insurance dispute. The insurer had filed a claim but failed to provide a written statement on a new demand raised by the insured during the proceedings. The court held that the procedural defect did not justify overturning the lower court's ruling as the claim was not substantively prejudiced.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAInsurance Act 1911, Section 10; Insurance Law Act 1911, Section 11: Failure to comment on a new claim in insurance proceedings does not automatically invalidate the proceedings if the claim was not substantively prejudiced.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IA
insurance law procedure
failure to comment
new claim demand
procedural defect
supreme court appeal
written statement requirement
substantive prejudice
perizia medica insufficiente
Disposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IAInsurance Act 1911, Section 10
Insurance Law Act 1911, Section 11
Decisioni correlate
Generato dall'IAkko-precedent_2008_104
Supreme Court quashes insurance court decision for lack of reasoning under administrative procedure law.
insurance_2010_3816-2008
Appeal court dismissed claim that panel member was biased by hearing case twice in same dispute.
insurance_2010_1805-2009
Insurance Court quashes decision for lack of final ruling on self-employed pension rights.
kko-other_2003_2193
Supreme Court dismissed appeal regarding oral hearing requirement in insurance court accident compensation case.
insurance_1984_1907-1983
Insurance court dismissed appeal regarding pension type change from partial to full disability pension.
Testo completo
Kysymys vakuutusoikeuden menettelystä, kun se ei ollut lausunut sille valituksessa esitetystä uudesta vaatimuksesta.