Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 720/2006 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismissed client's claim for increased damages due to changed trial circumstances without prior appeal.

Numero d'incarto KKO 720/2006
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court of Finland rejected the client's request to increase damages awarded by the district court. The client had been sentenced to compensation but failed to appeal the initial ruling before the trial proceedings began. Consequently, the court held that the lower court lacked jurisdiction to review the claim for increased compensation.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Käräjäoikeuslainsäädäntö; Korvauslainsäädäntö: A party cannot request an increase in compensation for changed trial circumstances if they did not appeal the original compensation decision before the trial commenced.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
compensation increase trial circumstances jurisdictional limitation failure to appeal procedural bar revisione di una decisione modifica di misure cautelari mutamento delle circostanze

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Käräjäoikeuslaki 1069/1999
Vahingonkorvauslaki 1015/1974
Generato dall'IA
appeal_1984_eastern-finland__2394
Appeal court allows state compensation for litigation costs when increasing damages in civil proceedings.
kko-precedent_2003_108
Supreme Court held defendant liable for costs despite acquittal due to post-trial lighter law application.
kko-precedent_2015_57
Supreme Court quashes appeal court ruling on damages channeling where defendant did not appeal lower court decision.
kko-precedent_2011_55
Supreme Court allows appeal to complete criminal trial judgment regarding unaddressed civil costs claim.
kko-other_2009_2249
Supreme Court dismissed claim for state compensation for costs incurred in attending the main hearing.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Rikosasian asianomistaja, jolle käräjäoikeudessa oli tuomittu korvausta ja joka ei ollut hakenut muutosta käräjäoikeuden ratkaisuun, vaati hovioikeuden pääkäsittelyssä oikeudenkäynnin aikana tapahtuneen olosuhteiden muutoksen vuoksi korvauksen korottamista. Hovioikeus tutki vaatimuksen ja korotti korvausta. Korkein oikeus poisti tätä koskevan lausuman ja jätti korotusvaatimuksen tutkimatta.