Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 2939/2006 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismissed claim for share of future property sale proceeds as statute of limitations expired.

Numero d'incarto KKO 2939/2006
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's claim for a share of future property sale proceeds based on a prior partition agreement. The defendant argued the claim was time-barred, while the plaintiff contended the obligation to pay arose only upon the eventual sale of the remaining property. The court held that the statute of limitations for the claim had expired before the property was sold, rendering the claim inadmissible.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Section 10 of the Act on the Limitation of Actions; the statute of limitations for a claim based on a partition agreement regarding future proceeds expires at the time the underlying event occurs, barring recovery if the event has not yet happened.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
statute of limitations partition agreement future proceeds time bar property division limitation period claim dismissal principio della continuità

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Section 10 of the Act on the Limitation of Actions
Generato dall'IA
kko-precedent_1995_195
Supreme Court allows return of alimony paid during child's residence with payer despite prior settlement.
kko-precedent_1992_20
Supreme Court dismisses appeal: post-divorce property division cannot be undone by revoking a binding partition agreement.
kko-precedent_2003_23
Supreme Court allows late claim to modify settlement due to exploitation of unequal negotiation power.
appeal_1980_eastern-finland__369
Court dismissed claim that land sale was sham to transfer ownership jointly despite single name on deed.
kko-other_2000_680
Spousal compensation claim for exclusive use of joint property after divorce dismissed due to lack of fault.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

A ja B olivat osituksessa sopineet, että A sai omistamansa kiinteistöt ja B puolestaan sai 20 prosenttia A:lle jääneiden kiinteistöjen "aikanaan toteutuvista luovutushinnoista". A:n myytyä kiinteistöt B vaati kanteella ositukseen perustuvaa saatavaansa. Kysymys siitä, oliko B:n saatava vanhentunut.