Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 2856/2006 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court allows appeal against dismissal of fraud charges due to procedural defect in lower court composition.

Numero d'incarto KKO 2856/2006
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court of Finland allowed the appeal against the district court's dismissal of two fraud charges. The district court had dismissed the case under Section 17 of the Act on Criminal Proceedings, but the High Court could not rule on the appeal in its standard composition. Consequently, the Supreme Court remanded the case for a new trial in the High Court with a special composition to address the procedural irregularity.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Section 17 of the Act on Criminal Proceedings; Section 1 of Section 9 of the High Court Act: When a High Court cannot rule on an appeal in its standard composition due to a procedural defect in the lower court's decision, the Supreme Court must remand the case for a new trial in a specially composed High Court.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
fraud charges dismissal of case High Court composition procedural defect remand for retrial criminal proceedings special composition vizio di procedura

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Section 17 of the Act on Criminal Proceedings
Section 1 of Section 9 of the High Court Act

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
KKO:2006:16
Supreme Court dismisses appeal because criminal charge exceeds 5000 euro threshold for simplified court composition.
Generato dall'IA
kko-other_2009_2319
Supreme Court allows appeal when lower court wrongly issues default judgment during preparation phase.
ECLI:FI:KKO:2025:53
Supreme Court dismisses appeal; summons with 3-month threat invalid when lawyer present and no personal hearing needed.
kko-precedent_2003_108
Supreme Court held defendant liable for costs despite acquittal due to post-trial lighter law application.
kko-precedent_2013_44
Supreme Court allows appeal on costs in family case without further handling permission as it falls under application proceedings.
kko-other_2018_1977
Supreme Court dismissed appeal regarding refusal of further proceedings permission in fraud case.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Käräjäoikeus oli hylännyt A:n ajaman, kahta petosta koskevan kanteen oikeudenkäynnistä rikosasioissa annetun lain 7 luvun 17 §:n nojalla. Valituksessaan hovioikeudelle A vaati, että käräjäoikeuden tuomio kumotaan ja että asia palautetaan käräjäoikeuteen valmistelua ja pääkäsittelyä varten. Asiaa ei hovioikeudessa voitu ratkaista hovioikeuslain 9 §:n 1 momentissa tarkoitetussa kokoonpanossa. Ks. KKO:2006:16

ROL 7 luku 17 §

HovioikeusL 9 § 1 mom