Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 2134/2006 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismisses claim that post-accident shoulder pain and movement restrictions are consequences of the accident.

Numero d'incarto KKO 2134/2006
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's claim regarding whether his post-accident shoulder pain and movement restrictions were consequences of the accident. The plaintiff argued that the broad pain syndrome and functional impairment following the fracture were directly caused by the injury. The court found that the symptoms did not meet the legal threshold for establishing a causal link to the accident.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Lain 155/1991 1 luku 10 a luku; The court held that post-accident pain and functional impairment must be directly and exclusively caused by the accident to be recognized as its consequences.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
work injury compensation causation standard post-accident symptoms functional impairment medical evidence Supreme Court ruling disability assessment accertamento medico incompleto

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Lain 155/1991 1 luku 10 a luku
Generato dall'IA
kko-precedent_2007_60
Supreme Court allows compensation for chronic neck pain aggravated by accident despite pre-existing degeneration.
kko-other_2012_2460
Supreme Court dismissed claim for compensation where pain in left upper limb was not causally linked to the 2007 accident.
kko-other_1996_674
Workplace injury claim dismissed because employee's fall was caused by his own negligence, not employer fault.
insurance_2013_3812-2012
Insurance court allows disability pension for self-employed by weighing business income against medical evidence.
kko-other_2010_2277
Supreme Court dismisses claim for long-term disability and hip pain causation to accident.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

A oli tapaturman seurauksena saanut oikean käden värttinäluun murtuman. Kysymys siitä, olivatko A:lla tapaturman jälkeen ilmenneet oikean yläraajan laaja-alainen kipuoireisto ja toiminnanhäiriö vapinaoireineen sekä oikean yläraajan luukato seurauksia tapaturmasta.