Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 1855/2006 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismisses appeal where prisoner's absence from trial was caused by transport cancellation due to his own conduct.

Numero d'incarto KKO 1855/2006
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal regarding the legality of the prisoner's absence from the High Court's main hearing. The appellant argued that his absence was lawful because the planned transport was cancelled due to his own behavior. The court held that the appellant's conduct directly caused the transport cancellation, rendering his absence unlawful and justifying the proceedings' continuation.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Laki vankeusrangaistuksen suorittamisesta 1066/1999; 1067/1999: The court ruled that a prisoner's absence from a hearing is unlawful if the transport cancellation was a direct result of the prisoner's own conduct, thereby negating the claim of lawful absence.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
prisoner absence transport cancellation own conduct lawful absence High Court hearing Supreme Court appeal criminal execution law motivo insorto dopo la fuga

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Laki vankeusrangaistuksen suorittamisesta 1066/1999
Laki vankeusrangaistuksen suorittamisesta 1067/1999
Generato dall'IA
kko-other_2026_341
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding illegal entry facilitation where applicant failed to prove state responsibility.
kko-other_1999_314
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding criminal law reduction under Section 33 when conditions not met.
kko-precedent_2016_84
Supreme Court found a valid health excuse prevented the defendant from attending trial, ruling the lower court's dismissal of his right to be heard was erroneous.
kko-precedent_2002_94
Supreme Court dismisses request to extend deadline for challenging a partition deed under procedural law.
ECLI:FI:KKO:2019:63
Supreme Court dismisses appeal; applicant who withdrew guardianship application must pay opponent's litigation costs.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Kysymys siitä, oliko vankeusrangaistusta suorittamassa olleella valittajalla ollut laillinen syy olla poissa hovioikeuden pääkäsittelystä, kun suunniteltu kuljetus oli peruuntunut hänen käyttäytymisensä takia.