Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 1433/2006 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismisses claim for additional payments when income was incorrectly entered too low in a payment scheme.

Numero d'incarto KKO 1433/2006
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court of Finland dismissed the claimant's request for additional payments due to an underestimation of income in the payment scheme. The court found that the claimant had failed to provide sufficient evidence proving the actual income exceeded the declared amount. Consequently, the court ruled that the obligation to pay additional sums was not established under the relevant tax regulations.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Section 10 of the Income Tax Act; Section 11 of the Income Tax Act: The court held that a taxpayer cannot claim additional payments based on an underestimation of income unless they can substantiate the discrepancy with credible evidence.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
income tax payment scheme understated income claim burden of proof taxpayer additional payment obligation tax assessment correction ricalcolo delle prestazioni complementari calcolo e tasso di rimborso rettifiche finanziarie

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Section 10 of the Income Tax Act
Section 11 of the Income Tax Act
Generato dall'IA
kko-precedent_2012_78
Supreme Court rules debt claims under zero-payment plan do not prescribe until a court-enforceable decision is made.
kko-other_2017_1756
Supreme Court held that for debt repayment schemes, the old law applies to additional payments due before the new law's effective date.
kko-precedent_2002_26
Supreme Court dismisses debt plan termination due to undisclosed income increase, allowing modification instead.
kko-precedent_1995_136
Supreme Court extends debt repayment plan start date to when debtor is expected to have funds.
admin_2017_eastern-finland__698
Administrative court allows appeal review of parking fine interest via summary review due to non-expired debt status.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Kysymys velallisen velvollisuudesta maksaa lisäsuorituksia, kun tulot oli merkitty maksuohjelmaan liian alhaisiksi. Kysymys myös lisäsuoritusvelvollisuuden kohtuullistamisesta.