Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 824/2005 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismisses appeal to remove suspension due to lack of proof regarding receipt of summons.

Numero d'incarto KKO 824/2005
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal seeking to remove the suspension of a property division proceeding. The respondent argued they never received the summons sent by post, yet the court found the suspension valid because the respondent was absent from the scheduled hearing. The court ruled that without evidence proving the summons was not received, the procedural requirements for lifting the suspension were not met.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Kiinteistönmuodostamislain 168 § 1 momentti; Kiinteistönmuodostamislain 169 § 2 momentti; Kiinteistönmuodostamislain 170 § 1 momentti: A suspension in a property division proceeding may be lifted only if the party proves they did not receive the summons; mere assertion of non-receipt without evidence does not satisfy the statutory requirement for removal of the suspension.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
property division suspension summons receipt evidence procedural due process appeal dismissal non-appearance hearing finzione di notifica postale difetto di sottoscrizione motivazione inadeguata delle censure costituzionali

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Kiinteistönmuodostamislain 168 § 1 momentti
Kiinteistönmuodostamislain 169 § 2 momentti
Kiinteistönmuodostamislain 170 § 1 momentti
Generato dall'IA
kko-precedent_2006_85
Supreme Court allows compensation claim for wrongful detention where post delivery notice was not proven received.
kko-precedent_1998_95
Supreme Court reverses High Court for failing to allow appealant access to trial documents before ruling.
appeal_1984_turku__873
Company meeting decision voided because invitation was sent via door post instead of registered mail as required by articles of association.
kko-other_1996_4974
Supreme Court dismissed appeal for being filed late to the survey office regarding border control procedures.
insurance_2009_5239-2008
Insurance court dismissed late appeal due to lack of hearing on delay reasons, remanding for new review.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Asianosainen oli kutsuttu lohkomistoimitukseen postin kuljetettavaksi vähintään 10 päivää ennen toimituskokousta annetulla kutsukirjeellä. Asianosainen ei ollut läsnä toimituksessa. Toimitus sai lainvoiman. Asianosainen ilmoitti tekemässään kantelussa, ettei hän ollut saanut kutsukirjettä.

Kysymys siitä, oliko edellytyksiä tehdystä kantelusta poistaa lohkominen.

KiinteistönmuodostamisL 168 § 1 mom

KiinteistönmuodostamisL 169 § 2 mom

KiinteistönmuodostamisL 170 § 1 mom