Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 630/2005 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismissed state compensation claim where police records were irrelevant to assessing fair trial rights.

Numero d'incarto KKO 630/2005
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the applicant's claim for state compensation regarding an unlawful detention. Although the lower court relied on police records obtained ex officio to reject the claim, the Supreme Court found these records irrelevant to the core issue of whether the applicant received a fair trial. The court ruled that the existence of such records did not alter the legal assessment of the applicant's rights under the Act on State Liability for Damages.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Act on State Liability for Damages; Act on the Right to a Fair Trial: The existence of police records obtained ex officio does not determine whether a detainee received a fair trial, and such records are irrelevant to the assessment of compensation claims based on procedural violations.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
state liability damages fair trial rights police records relevance unlawful detention compensation procedural violation assessment difetto di legittimazione del ministero pubblico omissione del ministero pubblico doveri del ministero pubblico

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Act on State Liability for Damages
Act on the Right to a Fair Trial
Generato dall'IA
kko-other_2011_1746
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding lower court's duty to transfer robbery case to main hearing.
insurance_2010_5370-2010
Insurance court allowed compensation for fear of violence even when threat wasn't a separate criminal charge.
kko-precedent_2011_58
Supreme Court allows separate civil trial for damages despite prior criminal conviction due to new evidence.
kko-precedent_1998_117
Supreme Court remands case to lower court for fact-finding on creditor's liability claim against heir.
kko-other_1996_346
Supreme Court dismissed appeal regarding state's liability for litigation costs when opposing party is a public authority.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

A oli pidätetty epäiltynä pahoinpitelyrikoksesta. Sittemmin hänet tuomittiin pahoinpitelystä sakkorangaistukseen. A vaati valtiolle korvausta sillä perusteella, että hänen pidättämiseensä ei ollut laillisia edellytyksiä. Käräjäoikeus hankki omasta aloitteestaan A:ta koskevan rikosrekisterin otteen, josta ilmeneviin tietoihin käräjäoikeus osin perusti kanteen hylkäävän ratkaisunsa. Hovioikeus katsoi, ettei rikosrekisteristä ilmenevillä tiedoilla ollut olennaista merkitystä harkittaessa sitä, oliko A:lla oikeus korvaukseen. Kysymys siitä, oliko A saanut hyväkseen oikeudenmukaisen käsittelyn.