Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
KKO 2693/2005 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismisses forgery charge where client printed a fake bank receipt to falsely claim payment was made.

Numero d'incarto KKO 2693/2005
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the charge of forgery against the client who printed a bank transaction receipt to falsely assert payment had been made. The court found that the client's act of printing a document without the bank's signature or authorization did not constitute the specific legal definition of forgery under Finnish law. Consequently, the prosecution failed to prove the necessary elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Laki rikoslaista 38.1.1998/387; 10.1.1998/388: The act of printing a document that appears to be an official bank record without the bank's actual signature or authorization does not constitute forgery if the document is not used to deceive a third party regarding the existence of a legal obligation or right.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
forgery charge bank receipt printed document false payment claim Supreme Court criminal liability document authentication fornitore di servizi di pagamento

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Laki rikoslaista 38.1.1998/387
10.1.1998/388
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

A oli esittänyt B:lle verkkopankin maksupalvelutapahtuman tulosteen osoittaakseen maksaneensa B:lle tulosteessa mainitun rahamäärän, vaikkei maksua tosiasiassa ollut tapahtunut. Kysymys siitä, oliko A menettelyllään syyllistynyt väärennykseen.