KKO 1921/2005
Generato dall'IA
Supreme Court dismissed claim for damages against public authority for breach of public procurement law.
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's claim for damages alleging a breach of the Public Procurement Act. The plaintiff argued that the public authority failed to fulfill its obligations under Section 8 of the Act, causing financial loss. The court ruled that the statutory provisions did not establish a liability for damages in this specific context.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAKysymys julkisista hankinnoista annetun lain 8 § 1 momentti; The Supreme Court held that the public authority is not liable for damages under the cited provision for the alleged breach.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IA
public procurement law
liability for damages
public authority breach
Section 8 Procurement Act
Supreme Court decision
financial compensation claim
administrative liability
offerente escluso
Disposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IASection 8, paragraph 1 of the Act on Public Procurement
Decisioni correlate
Generato dall'IAECLI:FI:KHO:2020:39
Court dismisses bid rejection claim where tenderer failed to notice non-compliant attachment before award decision.
kho-other_2019_368
Supreme Administrative Court dismissed public procurement appeal where group was excluded from tender process before eligibility review. Group failed to join tender procedure timely, so no compensation possible despite alleged errors.
market_2021_H181
Market Court dismisses bid rejection appeal, ruling procurement authority acted correctly on new information.
market_2021_H267
Market Court dismissed Skanska's appeal, ruling the procurement authority had valid grounds to terminate the tender process.
kho-precedent_2011_72
Public procurement law permits excluding bids that fail tender requirements unless those requirements violate the law.
Testo completo
Kysymys julkisista hankinnoista annetun lain mukaisesta vahingonkorvausvelvollisuudesta.
L julkisista hankinnoista 8 § 1 mom