KKO 1515/2005 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismissed appeal where claim was directed at wrong defendant and could not be dismissed for that reason.

Numero d'incarto KKO 1515/2005

Autorità giudiziaria Korkein oikeus

Giurisdizione

Finlandia (FI)

Data della decisione 17.06.2005

Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal against a decision to dismiss the main claim for lack of standing. The appellant argued the claim should have been dismissed because it targeted the wrong defendant, but the court found no legal basis for such dismissal. Consequently, the lower court's decision to reject the claim was upheld as the procedural defect did not justify dismissal.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Laki 1093/1972 oikeusvaltuutetun lainkäyttövelvollisuudesta 1 §; Laki 621/1999 oikeusvaltuutetun lainkäyttövelvollisuuden purkamisesta 1 §: The court cannot dismiss a claim solely because it is directed at the wrong defendant if the claimant lacks standing or if the procedural defect does not meet statutory requirements for dismissal.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA

wrong defendant dismissal of claim standing requirements procedural defect Supreme Court ruling correzione di errore materiale violazione dei diritti di parte errore amministrativo