Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 520/2004 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismisses appeal when respondent absent, ordering compensation for public defender's fees to state.

Numero d'incarto KKO 520/2004
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal against a lower court decision that had been annulled due to the respondent's absence. The lower court ordered the absent respondent to reimburse the state for the public defender's fees incurred for the victim. The court upheld this order because the procedural defect did not justify overturning the substantive liability for legal costs.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

L 24 § 1 mom yleisestä oikeusavusta; The court held that the absence of a party in the first instance does not automatically invalidate the lower court's decision on cost allocation, and the respondent remains liable for the public defender's fees.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
public defender fees state compensation respondent absence legal costs allocation appeal dismissal procedural defect general legal aid rimborso delle spese

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
L 24 § 1 mom yleisestä oikeusavusta
Generato dall'IA
kko-other_2003_361
Supreme Court dismisses claim for state reimbursement of defense lawyer fees and costs in criminal proceedings.
kko-other_2006_702
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding client's duty to reimburse state for opponent's legal costs under the Legal Aid Act.
kko-precedent_1991_49
Supreme Court purged lower court decision for wrongly applying rent control law on legal costs.
ECLI:FI:KKO:2025:42
Defendant must repay state for defense lawyer fees when losing criminal case involving state-appointed counsel.
kko-other_1997_1297
Creditor in debt restructuring must reimburse state for lawyer fees paid to debtor's counsel upon appeal rejection.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Hovioikeuden pääkäsittely rikosasiassa peruutettiin valittajana olleen vastaajan jäätyä pois, ja valitus jätettiin sillensä. Hovioikeus velvoitti vastaajan korvaamaan valtiolle yleistä oikeusapua saaneen asianomistajan avustajana toimineen julkisen oikeusavustajan palkkion. Kysymys korvauksen määräytymisen perusteista.

L yleisestä oikeusavusta 24 § 1 mom (104/1998)