Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 514/2004 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court held that damage from road construction compensation under Building Act is not a requisition case.

Numero d'incarto KKO 514/2004
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the claim that compensation for building damage caused by road construction constituted a requisition under the Requisition Act. The plaintiff argued the compensation was effectively a requisition, but the court distinguished between voluntary compensation under the Building Act and compulsory requisition. The decision clarified that statutory compensation for construction damage does not trigger the legal procedures of the Requisition Act.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Building Act s. 76; Requisition Act s. 1: Compensation for damage caused by public construction under the Building Act is not considered a requisition and does not require the procedures of the Requisition Act.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
Building Act compensation road construction damage requisition law distinction statutory compensation public works liability problema urbano rinnovamento urbano conservazione dei monumenti

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Building Act s. 76
Requisition Act s. 1
Generato dall'IA
kho-other_2017_4580
Supreme Administrative Court dismisses appeals against a zoning plan amendment permitting a large retail store on a central area.
kko-precedent_2001_61
City liable for road vibration damage; minor wall cracks exempt from tolerance duty under environmental damage act.
kho-other_2017_4109
Appeal dismissed; late response ignored, and planning authority members not biased by store interests.
kko-precedent_1987_121
Supreme Court dismisses compensation claim for loss of underground space value and extracted stone rights under expropriation law.
kho-other_2018_5116
Supreme Administrative Court allows appeal regarding staff transfer to company but dismisses claim on title change.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Kysymys siitä, oliko kadun rakentamisesta aiheutuneesta rakennuksen vaurioitumisesta rakennuslain 76 §:n nojalla tehty korvausvaatimus käsiteltävä lunastuslain mukaan.