KKO 2556/2004
Generato dall'IA
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding inadmissibility of prosecution's evidence due to lack of procedural grounds.
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe Supreme Court dismissed the prosecution's appeal against the lower courts' decision to exclude evidence. The prosecution argued that the evidence was inadmissible due to procedural violations, but the lower courts found no such grounds. The court upheld the lower courts' ruling because the prosecution failed to demonstrate a legal basis for excluding the evidence.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAKorkein oikeus 10.11.2004 KKO 2556/2004: Syyttäjää vastaan esitetyn esteellisyysväitteen käsittely käräjä- ja hovioikeudessa; esteellisyysväiteen puuttuminen tai väärin esittäminen johtaa väitteen hylkäämiseen.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IA
procedural exclusion
inadmissibility appeal
evidence admissibility
prosecution appeal
lower court ruling
perturbatore per situazione
diritto di essere sentito
difetto di motivazione
Decisioni correlate
Generato dall'IAappeal_1984_helsinki__131
Court of Appeal reversed lower court, ordering legal aid for assault case not deemed minor under statute.
kko-precedent_2000_51
Supreme Court dismisses prosecutor's disqualification claim for lack of objective grounds beyond mere allegations.
kko-other_2019_115
Supreme Court held lower court must notify principal hearing when defendant requests hearing on fraud-related sentencing factors.
kko-precedent_1996_129
Supreme Court rejects appeal to change trial court reasoning on arson charges due to lack of legal necessity.
kko-other_2008_2235
Supreme Court held lower court must submit case to main hearing in murder proceedings.
Testo completo
Kysymys syyttäjää vastaan esitetyn esteellisyysväitteen käsittelystä käräjäoikeudessa ja hovioikeudessa.