Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 2524/2004 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismissed appeal regarding legal aid eligibility for asylum screening procedure costs.

Numero d'incarto KKO 2524/2004
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the applicant's appeal concerning the entitlement to legal aid for costs in the asylum screening procedure. The applicant argued that the screening process was too complex to be covered by legal aid, while the state contended that the procedure is standard and does not require special assistance. The court ruled that the screening procedure is a routine administrative step and therefore does not meet the criteria for legal aid coverage under the relevant regulations.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Section 26, Chapter 2, Section 2 of the Legal Aid Act; The screening procedure for asylum seekers is considered a routine administrative step and does not constitute a case requiring legal aid for cost coverage.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
legal aid eligibility asylum screening procedure court costs reimbursement procedural complexity Supreme Court decision garanzia di un equo processo indigenza processuale non provata difetto di legittimazione del ministero pubblico

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Section 26, Chapter 2, Section 2 of the Legal Aid Act
Generato dall'IA
kko-other_2007_1683
Supreme Court allows litigation costs claim when first-instance court judgment is final and binding.
labour_2010_47
Court dismisses claimant's withdrawal and orders them to pay respondent's court costs.
kko-other_1996_346
Supreme Court dismissed appeal regarding state's liability for litigation costs when opposing party is a public authority.
kko-precedent_2012_15
Supreme Court allows legal aid office to limit legal aid to 80 hours in court proceedings. The court ruled that statutory limits apply unless extended by the court.
insurance_1996_3776-1996
Insurance Court dismisses litigation cost claim when applicant receives no other RIVL benefits.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Kysymys seulontamenettelyn edellytyksistä oikeudenkäyntikulujen korvaamista koskevassa asiassa.

OK 26 luku 2 §