Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 260/2003 Generato dall'IA

Court dismissed claim that defendant gained financial benefit from tax evasion exceeding sales proceeds.

Numero d'incarto KKO 260/2003
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court of Finland dismissed the prosecution's claim that the defendant obtained financial benefit from tax evasion. The defendant was obligated to pay duties and taxes exceeding the proceeds from the sale of alcohol, raising the issue of whether a financial gain existed. The court ruled that the obligation to pay amounts greater than the proceeds negated the existence of a net financial benefit from the crime.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

AlkoholiL 94 § (459/1968); RL 2 luku 16 § (143/1932): A person who must pay duties and taxes exceeding the proceeds from the sale of alcohol has not obtained a financial benefit from the crime.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
financial benefit tax evasion alcohol duties proceeds of crime Supreme Court criminal liability Finnish law raggiungimento del valore soglia

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
AlkoholiL 94 § (459/1968)
AlkoholiL 94 § (459/1968)
RL 2 luku 16 § (143/1932)
RL 2 luku 16 § (143/1932)
Generato dall'IA
kko-other_2005_2974
Court held that damages for customs duties constitute economic benefit and must be included in the fine calculation.
kko-other_2000_388
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding loss of value of smuggled alcohol not seized under specific forfeiture clause.
kko-precedent_1992_119
Supreme Court of Finland orders joint restitution of public tax evasion gains from alcohol theft to the state.
admin_2001_turku__118
Tax court limits penalty to 5,000 marks for late correction under Tax Procedure Act Section 32.
kho-precedent_2005_39
Supreme Administrative Court dismissed importers' tax appeal, allowing partial reimbursement of lower court costs.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

A oli velvoitettu suorittamaan välittämästään alkoholijuomasta tullia ja veroja määrä, joka ylitti sen myynnistä saadun palkkion. Kysymys siitä, oliko A saanut rikoksesta taloudellista hyötyä.

AlkoholiL 94 § (459/1968)

RL 2 luku 16 § (143/1932)