Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 772/2002 Generato dall'IA

Work injury claim rejected because pain felt during lifting was not a direct result of the specific injury.

Numero d'incarto KKO 772/2002
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the claim for work injury compensation because the plaintiff's pain during lifting was not a direct consequence of the tendon rupture. The court found that the injury occurred while the plaintiff was already experiencing pain, meaning the lifting act did not cause the damage. Consequently, the causal link required for statutory compensation under the Work Accident Insurance Act was not established.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Work Accident Insurance Act 1983; Liability Act 1972: Pain felt during a work task is not considered a work injury if the task did not cause the injury, even if the worker was already in pain.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
work accident insurance causal link requirement pre-existing pain tendon rupture lifting injury statutory compensation direct consequence distorsione del rachide cervicale

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Work Accident Insurance Act 1983
Liability Act 1972
Generato dall'IA
kko-other_2001_439
Work injury claim dismissed because pre-existing pain was not a direct cause of the new muscle tear.
insurance_1979_2790-1978
Insurance court dismissed work injury claim for shoulder tear caused by lifting heavy package.
kko-other_2000_2583
Supreme Court allows compensation for work-related muscle strain treated as occupational disease under Finnish Act on Work-Related Diseases.
kko-precedent_2011_16
Supreme Court dismisses claim that mallet finger was work-related due to insufficient injury energy.
kko-precedent_2010_76
Supreme Court allows work injury claim for tendon rupture caused by lifting 250kg load under Finnish Act.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

A oli työssään nostanut oikean käden pikkusormella valurautaista noin kaksikymmentä kiloa painavaa kaivonkantta siinä olevasta reiästä ja tuntenut sormessa kipua. A:lla oli todettu oikean käden pikkusormen koukistajajänteen repeämä. Kysymys oikeudesta tapaturmavakuutuslain mukaiseen korvaukseen.