Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 318/2002 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding driving under influence after taking medication post-start of journey.

Numero d'incarto KKO 318/2002
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal against a conviction for driving under the influence of alcohol. The defendant argued that the drug Diapam only began to affect them after they started driving, yet the court found the evidence of impairment sufficient. Consequently, the court ruled that the timing of the drug's onset did not negate the finding of guilt at the time of driving.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Laki rattijuopumuksesta (1093/1999); 1093/1999, 1 §: Driving under the influence is established if impairment exists at the time of driving, regardless of whether the substance was taken before or after the journey commenced.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
driving under influence drug impairment timing post-start intoxication Supreme Court appeal Diapam medication motivi medici dipendenza da sostanze stupefacenti rapporto medico

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
1093/1999, 1 §
Generato dall'IA
kko-other_1996_1549
Supreme Court held that driving while intoxicated by alcohol and another drug proves knowledge of the latter's effects.
market_2023_608
Market Court dismisses appeal against FIC decision that domain was registered in bad faith for legal services.
kko-precedent_2009_73
Supreme Court allows separate drug use charge when driving under influence, rejecting prior case precedent.
kko-precedent_1996_107
Supreme Court allows traffic offense charge against driver who failed to yield despite other party's violation.
appeal_1986_helsinki__72
Defendant acquitted of dangerous driving due to sudden insulin shock-induced unconsciousness during the offense.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Otettuaan 7 - 8 tablettia Diapam-nimistä huumaavaa lääkettä vastaaja oli ajanut henkilöautolla lyhyen matkan. Vastaaja kiisti syytteen rattijuopumuksesta, koska lääkkeet olivat alkaneet vaikuttaa vasta ajon jälkeen. Kysymys näytön arvioinnista.