KKO 189/2002
Generato dall'IA
Supreme Court dismissed appeal; oral hearing required when facts are disputed and no prior hearing occurred.
Finlandia (FI)
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe Supreme Court dismissed the appeal against the High Court's refusal to hold an oral hearing. The appellant argued that the High Court failed to conduct a necessary oral proceeding, while the respondent contended that the written record was sufficient. The Court ruled that an oral hearing is mandatory when material facts are contested and no prior hearing has taken place.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IALaki oikeudenkäyntijärjestästä 379/1996; 100 §: Oral hearing is required when material facts are disputed and no prior hearing has been held.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IA
oral hearing requirement
material facts dispute
High Court procedure
Supreme Court appeal
written record sufficiency
motivazione sufficiente
difetto di legittimazione del ministero pubblico
requisiti probatori
Disposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IALaki oikeudenkäyntijärjestästä 379/1996
Decisioni correlate
Generato dall'IAkko-other_2001_1715
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding failure to submit criminal case to lower court within statutory time limits.
kko-precedent_1995_115
Supreme Court quashes appeal court dismissal of assault charge due to lack of oral hearing violating right to defense.
kko-other_2009_2190
Supreme Court held lower court must transfer serious theft cases to main hearing for full review.
kko-other_1997_477
Supreme Court dismisses appeal when lower courts fail to justify acquittal under evidence rules.
kko-other_2019_682
Supreme Court allows recorded witness statements from lower court to be considered in serious drug offense trial.
Testo completo
Kysymys siitä, olisiko hovioikeuden tullut toimittaa asiassa suullinen käsittely.