Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 1566/2002 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismissed creditor's claim for payment order cessation as it lacked unreasonably delayed grounds.

Numero d'incarto KKO 1566/2002
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the creditor's request to cease the debtor's payment order under the Debt Restructuring Act. The creditor argued for cessation without providing specific reasons for the alleged unreasonable delay. The court ruled that the request was inadmissible because the creditor failed to substantiate the claim of delay.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

61 § 1 momentin velkajärjestelystä annetun lain mukaan maksuohjelman määräämiseksi raukeamaan hakemuksen esittäminen ilman aiheetonta viivytystä; velkojan on osoitettava viivästyksen olemassaolo ja se on perusteltamaton.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
Debt Restructuring Act payment order cessation unreasonable delay creditor's claim Supreme Court decision violazione del principio di celerità tardivo pagamento delle spese amministrazione infedele

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
61 § 1 momentin velkajärjestelystä annetun lain
Generato dall'IA
kko-leave_2026_15
Supreme Court rules debt restructuring payment plan termination request was timely filed without unjustified delay.
kko-other_1995_2335
Supreme Court clarifies that a debt repayment plan's start date is the date of the court's decision, not the agreement date.
kko-other_2007_97
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding debt restructuring payment scheme changes without unjustified delay after notice.
kko-other_1998_3526
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding termination of payment plan under Finnish Debt Restructuring Act Section 42.
kko-other_1995_4689
Supreme Court held that a confirmed payment plan duration cannot interrupt unemployment insurance assessment when the debtor's payment obligation was removed due to lack of funds.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Kysymys siitä, oliko velkoja tehnyt hakemuksensa maksuohjelman määräämiseksi raukeamaan yksityishenkilön velkajärjestelystä annetun lain 61 §:n 1 momentissa säädetyin tavoin ilman aiheetonta viivytystä.