Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 1542/2001 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismissed appeal regarding professional transmission of alcoholic substance leading to disqualification.

Numero d'incarto KKO 1542/2001
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal against a disqualification order issued for the professional transmission of an alcoholic substance. The appellant argued against the severity of the penalty based on specific circumstances, but the court found no merit in these arguments. Consequently, the original disqualification order was upheld as legally sound.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

AlkoholiL 94 §; RL 2 luku 16 §; AlkoholiL 95 §: The court established that a disqualification order for the professional transmission of an alcoholic substance stands when the appellant fails to provide sufficient grounds to challenge the statutory basis or the proportionality of the penalty.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
professional transmission alcoholic substance disqualification order appeal dismissal Supreme Court Alcohol Act criminal liability imposta sulle bevande

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
AlkoholiL 94 §
RL 2 luku 16 §
AlkoholiL 95 §
Generato dall'IA
kko-precedent_2007_85
Supreme Court allows confiscation of high-value car for repeat drunk driving despite low income.
kko-precedent_1997_20
Supreme Court dismisses seizure order against car for lack of defendant's hearing before forfeiture.
kko-precedent_2011_61
Supreme Court dismisses value forfeiture claim for consumed alcohol, allowing only profit differential forfeiture under current law.
kko-other_2018_1500
Supreme Court orders state to lose computer but allows restitution if illegal files are removed at owner's cost.
kko-precedent_1997_186
Smuggling of medicines abroad is not a crime; value forfeiture applies only if goods were hidden or destroyed. Court partially allowed appeal on value forfeiture grounds.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Kysymys asian palauttamisesta ammattimaisen alkoholipitoisen aineen välittämisen perusteella tuomittavan menettämisseuraamuksen käsittelemistä varten.

AlkoholiL 94 §

RL 2 luku 16 §

AlkoholiL 95 §