Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 20/2000 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court allows defense counsel appointment for pre-1997 criminal cases under new 1998 law provisions.

Numero d'incarto KKO 20/2000
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court permitted the appointment of defense counsel for a criminal case initiated before October 1, 1997, based on the new 1998 legislation. The prosecution argued that the old procedural rules applied to cases starting prior to the new law's enactment. The court ruled that the new provisions could be applied retroactively to ensure the defendant's right to legal representation was protected.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

ROL 2 luku 1 § (107/1998); The court established that the new criminal procedure law provisions regarding defense counsel apply retroactively to cases initiated before the law's effective date to guarantee the defendant's right to legal assistance.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
criminal procedure law retroactive application defense counsel appointment pre-1997 cases right to legal aid Supreme Court ruling procedural transition motivazione del mutamento giurisprudenza

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
ROL 2 luku 1 § (107/1998)
ROL 2 luku 1 § (107/1998)
Generato dall'IA
kko-precedent_1996_106
Supreme Court quashes Åland court's drunk driving sentence for applying 1993 law instead of 1976 law.
kko-precedent_1995_44
Supreme Court dismisses High Court's order to gather evidence for prosecution, citing ECHR Art. 6 equality of arms. High Court's decision to order supplementary investigation for prosecution violated fair trial principles. The court ruled that the High Court should have decided the case without remanding for evidence gathering. The High Court's order to gather evidence for the prosecution violated the equality of arms principle under ECHR Article 6. The Supreme Court found the High Court should have decided the case without remanding for evidence gathering. The High Court's order to gather evidence for the prosecution violated the equality of arms principle under ECHR Article 6. The Supreme Court found the High Court should have decided the case without remanding for evidence gathering. The High Court's order to gather evidence for the prosecution violated the equality of arms principle under ECHR Article 6. The Supreme Court found the High Court should have decided the case without remanding for evidence gathering.
kko-other_2002_773
Supreme Court allows lighter application of public peace disturbance law due to minor circumstances and lack of serious intent.
kko-precedent_1991_120
Supreme Court dismisses civil service evasion charge due to lighter law principle and insufficient prison term.
appeal_1981_eastern-finland__1805
Court of Appeal dismissed prosecutor's request to consolidate multiple convictions into a single crime.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Kysymys mahdollisuudesta määrätä oikeudenkäynnistä rikosasioissa annetun lain 2 luvun säännösten nojalla syytetylle puolustaja asiassa, joka oli tullut vireille ennen 1.10.1997.

ROL 2 luku 1 § (107/1998)