Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 107/2000 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismisses claim for accident compensation when injury occurs during mandatory work practice under the Employment Act.

Numero d'incarto KKO 107/2000
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the applicant's claim for accident compensation regarding an injury sustained during mandatory work practice. The applicant argued that the injury should be covered under the Work Accident Compensation Act, while the opposing party contended that the specific provisions of the Employment Act excluded such coverage for this context. The court ruled that the statutory framework for work practice under the Employment Act precludes the application of the Work Accident Compensation Act in this scenario.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Tapaturmakorvauslaki 1 § 1 kohta; Työeläkelaki 1 § 1 kohta: Injuries sustained during mandatory work practice governed by the Employment Act are excluded from compensation under the Work Accident Compensation Act.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
work practice injury employment act provisions accident compensation exclusion mandatory training coverage supreme court ruling provvedimento professionale nuova formazione nella stessa professione accesso alla professione

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Tapaturmakorvauslaki 1 § 1 kohta
Työeläkelaki 1 § 1 kohta
Generato dall'IA
kko-precedent_1989_52
Supreme Court dismisses claim that a knife cut during a lunch break in a social room was a work accident. The court rules the injury did not occur in work-related circumstances. The claim is rejected because the location and timing were not part of the work environment. The decision clarifies the strict boundaries of work accident coverage. This case establishes that breaks in designated social areas are not work-related. The ruling emphasizes the need for direct work connection for coverage. The court maintains the lower court's decision on the matter.
insurance_1978_6061-1977
Insurance court dismissed claim for work injury compensation when injury occurred during employer-organized sports training.
insurance_1977_6782-1976
Workplace injury during lunch break deemed work-related accident under Finnish Insurance Court jurisdiction.
kko-precedent_2000_93
Supreme Court holds injury during free time after event program ended is not a work accident under Act 4 § 1.
insurance_1998_3849-1997
Temporary work without payment does not constitute a TVL contract; meal allowance alone is insufficient compensation.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

A oli vammautunut työllisyysasetuksen mukaisessa työharjoittelussa. Kysymys hänen oikeudestaan tapaturmakorvaukseen.

TapVakL 1 § 1 mom