Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 3591/1999 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court rules that a new contract between original and new employer does not constitute a business transfer under Finnish law.

Numero d'incarto KKO 3591/1999
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the claim regarding a business transfer between A Oy and B Oy. The facts show A Oy managed hotels for X Oy, which later signed a new contract for the same work with B Oy. The court held that the new agreement between X and B did not create a transfer of business between A and B because no transfer of assets or employees occurred.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Section 1 of the Business Transfer Act 1999; A new service contract between the original client and a new service provider does not constitute a business transfer under the Business Transfer Act if no assets or employees are transferred.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
business transfer service contract employer liability asset transfer employee transfer Finnish law KKO 3591/1999 trasferimento dei rapporti di lavoro

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Section 1 of the Business Transfer Act 1999
Generato dall'IA
labour_2021_53
Union loses case as court finds union failed to prove employee was moved to a new workplace during business transfer.
labour_1997_22
Labor court dismissed claim for vacation pay based on expired collective agreement after business transfer.
kko-precedent_1996_11
Supreme Court dismisses appeal; bankruptcy trustee lacks right to terminate fixed-term contracts when business is sold.
labour_2010_122
Labor court dismisses union claim that collective agreement protects union rep during business transfer.
kko-precedent_1991_141
Supreme Court dismisses claim that business transfer occurred without explicit agreement between former and new employer.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

A Oy oli sopimuksen nojalla huolehtinut X Oy:n omistamien hotellien kerroshoitotyöstä. X Oy oli tehnyt uuden sopimuksen sanotusta työstä B Oy:n kanssa. Kysymys siitä, oliko A Oy:n ja B Oy:n välillä tapahtunut liikkeen luovutus.