Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 1840/1999 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismisses claim that a building attached to one co-owner's land burdens the other's share.

Numero d'incarto KKO 1840/1999
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the claim that a building owned by one co-owner burdens the other's share of the land. The court found that since the building was constructed on the land owned by the claimant, it did not create a legal burden on the defendant's co-ownership share. Consequently, the defendant could not demand the removal of the structure based on this argument.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Section 10 of the Act on the Ownership of Buildings; Section 10 of the Act on the Ownership of Buildings: A building constructed on land owned by one co-owner does not constitute a legal burden on the other co-owner's share of the land.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
co-ownership burden building ownership land ownership legal burden property rights contiguità proprietà immobiliare diritto esclusivo nella comproprietà

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Section 10 of the Act on the Ownership of Buildings
Generato dall'IA
kko-precedent_2003_82
Supreme Court rules wife retains half ownership of marital home buildings despite husband's bankruptcy and sole land title.
appeal_1986_helsinki__1414
Spousal division claim dismissed as consent given to cohabitation and statutory usage rights exist.
ECLI:FI:KKO:2023:41
Supreme Court dismisses eviction claim where usage right expired after 100 years of free use.
kko-other_2000_680
Spousal compensation claim for exclusive use of joint property after divorce dismissed due to lack of fault.
ECLI:FI:KKO:2026:54
Supreme Court dismisses sale order in inheritance when heir's possession right blocks co-ownership feasibility.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Aviopuolisot A ja B omistivat puoliksi A:n omistamalla tilalla olevan rakennuksen. Kysymys siitä, rasittiko kiinnitys B:n omistamaa osuutta tilalla olevasta rakennuksesta.