Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 1197/1999 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding debt payment during restructuring that became bankruptcy debt.

Numero d'incarto KKO 1197/1999
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal challenging the District Court's procedural handling of a debt payment made during a company's restructuring proceedings. The company paid a creditor during restructuring, but was placed in bankruptcy three months after the restructuring failed. The court held that the payment was validly made and thus became part of the bankruptcy estate, ruling the lower court's inquiry into the opposing party's stance on a non-appealed counterclaim was procedurally correct.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

OK 24 luku 14 § 2 mom; OK 26 luku 11 a § 1 mom; YSL 32 § 2 mom: A payment made by a debtor during restructuring proceedings that subsequently fails and leads to bankruptcy becomes part of the bankruptcy estate, and the court may inquire into the opposing party's position on matters not raised in the appeal.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
bankruptcy estate inclusion restructuring proceedings payment procedural inquiry validity counterclaim scope creditor debt discharge omissione del difensore vertenza di assicurazione sociale causa di carattere pecuniario

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
OK 24 luku 14 § 2 mom
OK 24 luku 14 § 2 mom (1064/1991)
OK 26 luku 11 a § 1 mom
OK 26 luku 11 a § 1 mom (595/1993)
YSL 32 § 2 mom
YSL 32 § 2 mom (47/1993)

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
KKO:1999:57
Supreme Court allows recovery of debts incurred during liquidation when company enters bankruptcy within three months.
Generato dall'IA
kko-precedent_1999_57
Supreme Court allows recovery of debts incurred during liquidation when company enters bankruptcy within three months.
ECLI:FI:KKO:2024:57
Supreme Court dismisses appeal on insolvency petition denial due to lack of evidence for creditor rights infringement.
kko-precedent_2000_81
Supreme Court allows partial repayment plan to exclude guarantors' subrogation rights due to equality requirements.
admin_2011_helsinki__637
Administrative court allows VAT advance refunds pre-reorganization but disallows those post-reorganization start date.
kko-precedent_1997_187
Supreme Court dismisses appeal when defendant lacks standing to sue for clawback in insolvency proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Asiassa, jossa sovinto oli sallittu, hovioikeus oli tiedustellut asianosaisten käsitystä sellaisen vastaseikan merkityksestä, johon vastaaja ei ollut vedonnut valituksessaan tai vastauksessaan. Kysymys hovioikeuden menettelyn oikeellisuudesta.

Yhtiö oli maksanut velkojalle velan, joka oli syntynyt yhtiön saneerausmenettelyn aikana. Yhtiö asetettiin konkurssiin kolmen kuukauden kuluessa saneerausmenettelyn keskeyttämisestä. Kysymys siitä, voitiinko maksu peräyttää konkurssipesään.

Ks. KKO:1999:57

OK 24 luku 14 § 2 mom (1064/1991)

OK 26 luku 11 a § 1 mom (595/1993)

YSL 32 § 2 mom (47/1993)