Supreme Court dismissed appeal regarding defendant's mental state, ruling evidence insufficient to prove insanity at trial time.

The Supreme Court dismissed the defendant's appeal challenging the court's finding on their mental state during the trial. The prosecution argued the defendant was mentally competent, while the defense claimed evidence of insanity existed but was not substantiated by expert testimony. The court ruled that the lower court correctly applied the law because the evidence presented failed to meet the high threshold required to establish insanity at the time of the alleged offense.