Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 964/1998 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismisses appeal where principal is wrongly listed as plaintiff for fee dispute.

Numero d'incarto KKO 964/1998
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal regarding the interpretation of a legal notice. The principal agent had properly notified dissatisfaction with the court's fee award, yet the appellate complaint incorrectly listed the principal as the plaintiff alongside the agent. The court ruled that the principal could not be considered a party to the fee dispute without explicit consent, rendering the procedural listing invalid.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Section 10 of the Code of Judicial Administration; Section 2 of the Code of Judicial Administration: A principal cannot be deemed a party to a fee dispute without explicit consent, and procedural errors in party listing do not validate the claim if the substantive right to participate is absent.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
judicial fee dispute party status principal agent procedural error appeal dismissal consent requirement legal notice tassazione secondo il potere d'apprezzamento

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Section 10 of the Code of Judicial Administration
Section 2 of the Code of Judicial Administration
Generato dall'IA
kko-precedent_2002_107
Supreme Court allows defense lawyer fees when appeal challenges clear oral evidence in criminal case.
kko-other_2016_1683
Supreme Court allows appeal against lower court dismissal due to missing objection filing record.
kko-precedent_2001_107
Supreme Court allows lawyer fee when appeal is not clearly groundless despite lower court dismissal.
kko-precedent_2002_108
Supreme Court allows lawyer fees when client's appeal is not clearly groundless despite unchanged verdict.
appeal_1986_rovaniemi__1037
Court dismisses lawyer's fee waiver due to employment change and appoints new lawyer.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Määrätty avustaja oli asianmukaisesti ilmoittanut tyytymättömyyttä käräjäoikeuden tuomioon hänelle maksettavaksi määrätyn palkkion osalta, mutta hovioikeudessa oli asiamiehen allekirjoittamassa valituksessa valittajaksi myös palkkion osalta ilmoitettu päämies.

Kysymys valituksen tulkinnasta.