Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KKO 4039/1998 Generato dall'IA

Construction contract delay caused by late drawings; contractor's notices constituted valid claims under contract terms.

Numero d'incarto KKO 4039/1998
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court of Finland allowed the contractor's claim for additional costs due to delayed drawings provided by the client. The contractor had formally notified the client of the missing and late plans, which caused work stoppages. The court ruled that these notifications satisfied the contractual requirements for a valid claim under the general construction contract terms.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

YSE 1983, 37 §; A contractor's timely notice of delays caused by the employer's failure to provide drawings constitutes a valid claim for additional costs under the contract terms.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
construction contract delay damages employer's breach notice requirement additional costs general terms claim validity responsabilità dell'architetto

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
YSE 1983, 37 §
Generato dall'IA
kko-precedent_2008_19
Supreme Court allows partial claim for change orders but dismisses extension of time due to lack of proven causation.
labour_2020_75
Labor court dismissed claim for bonus based on formal role rather than actual supervisory duties under collective agreement.
kko-precedent_1992_178
Supreme Court dismisses subcontractor's claim against owner for main contractor's bankruptcy damages under exemption clause.
kko-precedent_1999_101
Contractor bears risk for design errors in unit-price contract where client accepted alternative technical solution.
kko-other_2004_2037
Supreme Court holds employer liable for employee's injury caused by a defective railing attachment during construction work.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Rakennusurakassa, johon oli sovellettava rakennusurakan yleisiä sopimusehtoja YSE 1983, rakennuttajan urakoitsijalle toimitettavaksi sovitut piirustukset ja suunnitelmat olivat myöhästyneet seurauksin, että urakoitsijan työt olivat viivästyneet. Työmaakokousten pöytäkirjamerkintöjen mukaan urakoitsija oli huomauttanut piirustusten ja suunnitelmien puuttumisesta tai myöhästymisestä. Kysymys siitä, olivatko huomautukset sellaisia reklamaatioita, jotka mainittujen sopimusehtojen 37 §:n mukaan olivat lisäkustannusten korvauksen saamisen edellytyksenä.