Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
KKO 3363/1998 Generato dall'IA

Spousal joint farming liability determined by active participation and shared benefit in husband's absence.

Numero d'incarto KKO 3363/1998
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Finlandia (FI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court of Finland allowed the claim against both spouses for joint liability regarding duck farming profits. The husband, who owned the profession, operated the farm while the wife assisted primarily during his absences, and profits were directed to a joint account. The court ruled that the wife's active participation and the shared financial benefit established joint liability despite her limited residence on the property.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Kansaneläkelain 10 §; perheoikeuslain 10 §: When spouses jointly own a farm and one spouse actively participates in the business operations while the other is absent, both are liable for the business debts if profits are shared.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
spousal joint liability farming business active participation shared profits business debt husband absence joint account divisione della proprietà

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Kansaneläkelain 10 §
perheoikeuslain 10 §
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Puolisoiden yhteisesti omistamalla tilalla harjoitettiin kanataloutta ja tilan tuotto ohjattiin puolisoiden yhteiselle tilille, johon kummallakin puolisolla oli käyttöoikeus. Puoliso B, jolla oli oma ammatti ja joka asui omien virkatehtäviensä vuoksi tilalla vain viikonloppuisin ja loma-aikoina, osallistui kanojen hoitamiseen lähinnä A:n poissaollessa. Kysymys siitä, olivatko puolisot harjoittaneet yhteisesti omistamallaan tilalla kanataloutta yhteiseen lukuun ja olivatko molemmat puolisot vastuussa toisen puolison hankkimien kananuorikoiden kauppahinnan maksamisesta.